AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics >
          Volume 37, Number 2, August 2012 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://purl.umn.edu/134287

Title: A Method for Improving Welfare Estimates from Multiple-Referendum Surveys
Authors: Kim, GwanSeon
Petrolia, Daniel R.
Interis, Matthew G.
Keywords: quasi double-bound method
single-bound method
willingness to pay
Issue Date: 2012-08
Series/Report no.: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
37-2
Abstract: This paper introduces an alternative non-market value elicitation method—the “quasi-doublereferendum” (QDR)—applied to barrier island restoration in Mississippi. It is appropriate for surveys that elicit willingness-to-pay responses to multiple projects differing in scale only and can be used to increase efficiency while mitigating bias. We compare results to the more commonly used single-referendum (SR) method under two admissible ranges of willingness to pay: negative to positive infinity, and zero to income. The confidence intervals of the QDR models were narrower. We argue that the QDR approach should be less subject to bias than the commonly used double-referendum approach.
URI: http://purl.umn.edu/134287
Institution/Association: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics>Volume 37, Number 2, August 2012
Total Pages: 12
From Page: 289
To Page: 300
Collections:Volume 37, Number 2, August 2012

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
pp289-300,Kim.pdf432KbPDFView/Open
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.

 

 

Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: