AgEcon Search >
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review (continues the Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics) >
Volume 41, Number 2, August 2012 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||How Potential Carbon Policies Could Affect Where and How Cotton Is Produced in the United States|
|Authors: ||Nalley, Lawton Lanier|
Popp, Michael P.
Brye, Kristofor R.
Matlock, Marty B.
|Authors (Email): ||Nalley, Lanier (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
life cycle assessment
|Issue Date: ||2012-08|
|Abstract: ||Using life cycle assessment methodology, this analysis evaluates how two carbon reduction strategies affect cotton plantings regionally and methods used to produce cotton. Because cotton production emits large amounts of carbon, the design of a reduction policy as either excluding soil sequestration through cap-and-trade or including it through carbon offset is likely to affect the success of the policy. A cap-and-trade program that ignores the amount of carbon cotton would sequester in the soil during its life cycle could increase net emissions by rewarding producers whose crops emit limited carbon directly but also sequester little carbon in the ground.|
|Institution/Association: ||Agricultural and Resource Economics Review> Volume 41, Number 2, August 2012|
|Total Pages: ||17|
|From Page: ||215|
|To Page: ||231|
|Collections:||Volume 41, Number 2, August 2012|
Recommend this item
Files in This Item:
|ARER 201208 215x231 Nalley.pdf||Article 6||698Kb||PDF||View/Open|
All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.